Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 74
Filtrar
1.
Am J Surg ; 222(4): 694-699, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34024630

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Wastage of surgical supplies results from inappropriate anticipation of surgical needs in the operating room and contributes to avoidable healthcare costs. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 28,768 elective cases at the University of Chicago Medical Center from 2016 through 2018 was conducted. Attending surgeon-scrub nurse and surgeon-circulating nurse familiarity scores were calculated. Odds of surgical waste generation based on surgeon-scrub nurse and surgeon-circulating nurse familiarity were estimated through multivariate logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: Teams in the third and fourth quartiles of surgeon-scrub familiarity were significantly associated with reduced odds of waste (odds ratios 0.80 [p = 0.003] and 0.83 [p = 0.030], respectively). There was no significant reduction of odds of waste generation as surgeon-circulator familiarity increased. CONCLUSIONS: Greater surgeon-scrub familiarity was associated with lower risk of waste generation. Cost savings may be realized through supporting staffing schedules that promote consistency of surgeon-scrub teams.


Asunto(s)
Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Quirófanos/economía , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Chicago , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Anesth Analg ; 132(5): 1450-1456, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33667211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pharmacological treatments for critical processes in patients need to be initiated as rapidly as possible; for this reason, it is a standard of care to prepare the main anesthesia and emergency drugs in advance. As a result, 20%-50% of the prepared drugs remain unused and are then discarded. Decreasing waste by optimizing drug use is an attractive strategy for meeting both cost containment and environmental sustainability. The primary end point of this study was to measure the actual amount of drug wastage in the operating rooms (ORs) and intensive care units (ICUs) of a Regional Health Service (RHS). The secondary end point was to analyze and estimate the economic implications of this waste for the Health Service and to suggest possible measures to reduce it. METHODS: This prospective observational multicenter study was conducted across 12 hospitals, all of which belong to the same RHS in the north-east of Italy. Data collection took place in March 2018 and included patients admitted to ICUs, emergency areas, and ORs of the participating hospitals. Data concerning drug preparation and administration were collected for all consecutive patients, independent of case types and of whether operations were scheduled or unscheduled. Drug wastage was defined as follows: drugs prepared in ready-to-use syringes but not administered at all and discarded untouched. We then estimated the costs of wasted drugs for a 1-year period using the data from this study and the yearly regional pharmacy orders of drugs provided to the ORs and ICUs. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to validate the robustness of our assumptions and qualitative conclusions. RESULTS: We collected data for a total of 13,078 prepared drug syringes. Drug wastage varied from 7.8% (Urapidil, an alpha-1 antagonist antihypertensive) to 85.7% (epinephrine) of prepared syringes, with an overall mean wastage rate of 38%. The estimated yearly waste was 139,531 syringes, for a total estimated financial cost of €78,060 ($92,569), and an additional quantity of medical waste amounting to 4968 kg per year. The total provider time dedicated to the preparation of unused drugs was predicted to be 1512 working hours per year. CONCLUSIONS: The overall extent of drug wastage in ORs and ICUs is concerning. Interventions aimed at minimizing waste-related costs and improving the environmental sustainability of our practice are paramount. Effort should be put into designing a more efficient workflow that reduces this waste while providing for the emergency availability of these medications in the OR and ICU.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Costos de Hospital , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Quirófanos/economía , Anestésicos/provisión & distribución , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Composición de Medicamentos/economía , Utilización de Medicamentos/economía , Humanos , Italia , Residuos Sanitarios/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Jeringas/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Flujo de Trabajo
3.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(5_suppl): 427S-430S, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31631678

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To quantify differences in waste and cost of disposable equipment between different tonsillectomy techniques. METHODS: Prospective study of waste attributable to disposable waste produced by tonsillectomy surgery. Disposable equipment required for tonsillectomy using cold, monopolar electrocautery (ME), and coblation techniques was measured; and differences in mass, volume, and cost of equipment between the 3 techniques were quantified. RESULTS: Cold technique was found to produce the least waste and have the lowest cost attributable to disposable surgical equipment. Projected single-case savings in mass and volume of waste resulting from using cold technique compared to ME were 1.272 kg and 1.013 L, respectively, and 1.043 kg and 1.723 L compared to coblation. Projected single-case savings in cost of disposable equipment for cold technique compared to ME were US$9.35 and US$185.05 compared to coblation. DISCUSSION: Using cold technique for adult tonsillectomy reduces waste and cost of disposable equipment compared to ME and coblation. Implications for Practice: Surgeons desiring to reduce cost and waste associated with tonsillectomy surgery may consider transitioning to cold technique.


Asunto(s)
Criocirugía/economía , Criocirugía/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Residuos Sanitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Tonsilectomía/métodos , Adulto , Criocirugía/métodos , Equipos Desechables/economía , Equipos Desechables/estadística & datos numéricos , Electrocoagulación/economía , Electrocoagulación/métodos , Humanos , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Tonsilectomía/economía
4.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 89(5): 867-870, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33105307

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Balanced resuscitation strategies have led to increased utilization of plasma. Fresh frozen plasma that is thawed and never used is a large source of blood component wastage. Thawed plasma (TP) and can only be stored for 5 days. Liquid plasma (LP) has never been frozen and can be stored for 26 days. Due to longer storage duration, we hypothesized that using LP would result in decreased waste and cost savings compared with TP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all trauma patients at our Level I trauma center in the years 2015 to 2016. We compared 2015 when only TP was used to 2016 when both TP and LP were used. All plasma units ordered for trauma patients were tracked until the time of transfusion or wastage. Wastage rates were compared between years and plasma type. RESULTS: There were 5,789 trauma patients admitted to our institution from 2015 to 2016. There were 4,107 plasma units ordered with 487 (11.9%) units wasted. During 2015, 2,021 total units of plasma were ordered with 273 (13.5%) units wasted which was a significantly higher rate than 2016 when 2,086 total units of plasma were ordered and 214 (10.3%) units were wasted (p = 0.0013). During 2016, 1,739 units of TP were ordered and 204 (11.7%) units were wasted which was significantly higher than LP wastage, 347 units ordered and 10 (2.9%) units wasted (p < 0.001). Of the 477 wasted TP units, 76.9% were ordered no more than two times before being wasted and 95.8% were ordered no more than three times before being wasted. Of the 10 LP units wasted, 40% were ordered no more than two times before being wasted, and 50% were ordered no more than three times before being wasted. If TP was wasted at the same rate as LP, 368 fewer units of plasma would have been wasted representing US $39,376 (US $107/unit) of wasted health care expenses. CONCLUSION: At a Level I trauma center, the addition of LP to the blood bank for trauma resuscitations significantly reduced plasma wastage rates and health care expenses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Economic/Decision.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Plasma , Resucitación/métodos , Centros Traumatológicos/economía , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto , Bancos de Sangre/economía , Bancos de Sangre/organización & administración , Bancos de Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/economía , Transfusión de Componentes Sanguíneos/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resucitación/economía , Resucitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/economía
5.
J Glaucoma ; 29(12): 1179-1183, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910012

RESUMEN

PRéCIS:: The use of disposable tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses at a large ophthalmology outpatient service incurs significant financial and environmental waste that may not be justified given the limited data surrounding arguments for their use. PURPOSE: To quantify the economic and environmental burden of single-use plastics from an ophthalmology outpatient service at a large tertiary hospital and describe the relative value and evidence for the safety of disposable versus nondisposable tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses. METHODS: The total number of single-use applanation tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses used per year at Boston Medical Center (BMC) was estimated, and the average dollars spent and plastic waste generated in kilograms per year were then determined. These values were compared with the total spending and waste that would be produced if the clinic were to use nondisposable tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses exclusively. RESULTS: Single-use tonometer prisms cost an average of $70,282 per year and produce ~100.8 kg of plastic waste per year at BMC. Single-use gonioscopy lenses cost ~$9,040 per year and produce 8.8 kg of plastic waste per year at BMC. An excess of $65,185 and 109.6 kg of plastic waste could be avoided each year by only using nondisposable tonometer prisms and gonioscopy lenses at the BMC ophthalmology outpatient service. CONCLUSIONS: Single-use plastics in ophthalmology outpatient services generate significant environmental waste and financial cost compared with nondisposable instruments. This cost may outweigh the benefits of these instruments given the limited data surrounding arguments for their use.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Equipos Desechables , Factores Económicos , Ambiente , Oftalmología/estadística & datos numéricos , Plásticos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Boston , Equipos Desechables/economía , Equipos Desechables/estadística & datos numéricos , Gonioscopía/economía , Gonioscopía/instrumentación , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Presión Intraocular , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Tonometría Ocular/economía , Tonometría Ocular/instrumentación
6.
Emerg Nurse ; 28(6): 35-40, 2020 Nov 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32783433

RESUMEN

Thromboprophylactic medicine is provided routinely to patients who present to emergency departments (EDs) with lower leg fractures as a preventive measure against forming blood clots in an immobilised limb. A large amount of medicine is provided to these patients at discharge, but once they have recovered their mobility the remaining medicine is unusable and must be destroyed. There is a lack of data to quantify this waste. This article reports a service evaluation that was conducted in an ED to investigate the wastage and the cost implications of this treatment protocol. It shows that over half the medicine dispensed is subsequently wasted and makes recommendations for changing dispensing practice.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Enoxaparina/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Moldes Quirúrgicos , Ahorro de Costo , Inglaterra , Enoxaparina/administración & dosificación , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Humanos , Inmovilización , Traumatismos de la Pierna/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Pierna/terapia , Auditoría Médica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología
8.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 105(6): 1205-1209, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31473131

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During an orthopedic or trauma surgery procedure, when an implantable medical device is unpackaged, not implanted and cannot be resterilized, it is considered "waste". The cost burden falls on the hospital. The French Social Security Code provides for add-on reimbursement for certain expensive or very specialized devices (supplementary list of costly implants). To allow its restocking without linking it to a patient or reimbursement request, the wasted implant is tracked in a computerized database. The economic impact of these wasted implants is not known in France. This led us to conduct a retrospective study: 1) to determine the percentage and number of wasted implants, 2) to identify elements related to the surgery that impact implant waste. HYPOTHESIS: Various elements of the surgical environment (type of procedure, specialty, surgeon experience, time of year) can independently contribute to the non-implantation of a medical device. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective observational study of data collected prospectively in the database of our teaching hospital in 2016. The primary outcome was the percentage of wasted implants. The secondary outcome was the mean cost of these wasted implants. These parameters were determined for all the implants used in orthopedics and trauma surgery and tracked in this department, then for each variable hypothesized to led to non-implantation. Our analysis was descriptive, then comparative. RESULTS: In our database, 29,073 devices were tracked (€3,761,180), of which 1995 devices were wasted (6.9%). The total cost of the wasted implants was €179,193 (4.8% of the overall cost). The breakdown of the wasted implants was 430 (4.4%) from the add-on list (average cost of €293.10) versus 1565 implants associated with the hospital's diagnosis-related group payment system (average cost of €33.90). Trauma surgery procedures had significantly more wasted implants than orthopedic surgery (1135 vs. 860 (p<0.01)), although the individual cost was less (€59.20 vs. €130.10 (p<0.01)). Fracture fixation implants were more likely to be wasted than ligament reconstruction or arthroplasty implants, with a lower mean cost. More implants were wasted during hip arthroplasty than during other arthroplasty procedures. Less experienced surgeons wasted more implants than more experienced surgeons (1087 vs. 905 (p<0.01)) but these implants cost less (€69.20 vs. €114.80 (p<0.05)). The percentage of implants wasted was higher during the resident changeover period relative to the other months of the year (772 vs. 1223 (p<0.01)). DISCUSSION: This study is the first attempt at quantifying the number and cost of wasted implants in the context of orthopedics and trauma surgery at a teaching hospital in France. While trauma surgery is associated with more wasted implants, the cost burden is higher in orthopedics. Surgeons, by virtue of their experience and teaching mandate, have a decisive role managing this cost burden. TYPE OF STUDY: IV, Retrospective study.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Ortopedia/economía , Prótesis e Implantes/economía , Centros Traumatológicos/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Francia , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
BMJ Open ; 9(5): e024767, 2019 05 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092644

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Redispensing by pharmacies of medication unused by another patient could contribute to optimal use of healthcare resources. This study aimed to assess patient willingness to use medication returned by another patient and patient characteristics associated with this willingness. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: A total of 41 community and 5 outpatient pharmacies in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 2215 pharmacy visitors. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients completed a questionnaire regarding their willingness to use medication returned unused to the pharmacy by another patient, assuming quality was guaranteed. Secondary outcome measures included patient sociodemographic characteristics that were associated with patient willingness, analysed using logistic regression analysis and reported as ORs with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Of the 2215 patients (mean (SD) age 50.6(18.0) years; 61.4% female), 61.2% were willing to use medication returned unused to the pharmacy by another patient. Patients who were unwilling mostly found it risky. Men were more willing to use returned medication (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6), as did patients with a high educational level (OR 1.8 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5), those who regularly use 1-3 medications (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.1 to 1.7), those who returned medication to the pharmacy for disposal (OR 1.5 95% CI 1.0 to 2.3) and those who ever had unused medication themselves (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6)). Patients with non-Dutch cultural background were less willing to use returned medication (OR 0.395% CI 0.3 to 0.4)). CONCLUSIONS: When quality is guaranteed, a substantial proportion of patients are willing to use medication returned unused to the pharmacy by another patient. This suggests that implementation of redispensing may be supported by patients.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia/psicología , Utilización de Medicamentos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/provisión & distribución , Farmacia/métodos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción , Adulto , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Ahorro de Costo , Quimioterapia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/economía , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 18(1): 101, 2018 10 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30285729

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Research waste can occur when trials are conducted in the wrong populations. Vitamin D deficient populations are most likely to benefit from vitamin D supplementation. We investigated waste attributable to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of supplementation in populations that were not vitamin D deficient. METHODS: In December 2015, we searched Pubmed, recent systematic reviews, and three trial registries for RCTs of vitamin D with clinical endpoints in adults, and 25-hydroxvitamin D (25OHD) survey data relevant to large (N ≥ 1000) RCTs. We investigated the proportion of RCTs that studied vitamin D deficient populations, temporal trends in baseline 25OHD, and whether investigators in large RCTs considered relevant 25OHD survey data or systematic reviews in their trial justifications. RESULTS: Of 137 RCTs of vitamin D with clinical endpoints, 118 (86%) reported baseline mean/median 25OHD, which was < 25, 25-49, 50-74, and ≥ 75 nmol/L in 12 (10%), 62 (53%), 36 (31%), and 8 (7%) RCTs, respectively. In 70% of RCTs, baseline 25OHD was > 40 nmol/L. Baseline 25OHD increased over time. Before 2006, 38%, 62%, 0% and 0% of RCTs had baseline 25OHD < 25, 25-49, 50-74, and ≥ 75 nmol/L respectively; in 2011-15, the respective proportions were 9%, 49%, 37%, and 6%. Of 12 RCTs with baseline 25OHD < 25 nmol/L, 8 had neutral findings. Of 25 large RCTs (18 completed, 7 ongoing), 1 was undertaken in a vitamin D deficient population, 3 in vitamin D insufficient populations, and 17 had, or probably will have, baseline 25OHD > 40 nmol/L. 44% (8/18) of large completed RCTs cited relevant prior population 25OHD data, and only 3/10 (30%) relevant prior systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 70% of RCTs of vitamin D with clinical endpoints, 71% of large completed RCTs, and 100% of ongoing large RCTs could be considered research waste because they studied cohorts that were not vitamin D deficient.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Residuos Sanitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Humanos , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación
11.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 18(1): 103, 2018 10 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30305046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Research waste is estimated to be very common, but assessments of its prevalence and scope are rare. As an example, we assessed research waste in clinical research on calcium intake (assessing study design and endpoint type) and vitamin D supplementation (assessing endpoint type). METHODS: We examined 404 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of calcium intake (diet or supplements) and bone mineral density (BMD) or fracture, and 547 RCTs of vitamin D supplements, and assessed the proportion of studies that used surrogate or clinical endpoints. For studies with BMD or fracture as an endpoint, we estimated when the 'tipping' point occurred indicating the need for RCTs with fracture as an endpoint (based on cumulative meta-analyses of BMD RCTs, and chronological review of observational studies), and whether each study published at least 5y after the tipping point was novel, added new clinical knowledge or was research waste. RESULTS: Observational studies of calcium intake and BMD or fracture outnumbered RCTs by 3.3-4.5 times. For both calcium intake and vitamin D supplements, studies using surrogate endpoints outnumbered studies using clinical endpoints by 1.6-3 times. Of 41 RCT publications of calcium intake and BMD or fracture published at least 5y after the tipping point in 1994, we considered that 19 (46%) lacked novelty, another 13 (32%) added no new clinical knowledge, and 30 (73%) were research waste. Of 204 observational study publications of calcium intake and BMD or fracture, 197 (96%) lacked novelty, another 5 (2%) added no new clinical knowledge, and 202 (99%) were research waste. Of 39 RCTs of vitamin D supplementation and BMD or fracture published at least 5y after the tipping point in 1999, 14 (36%) lacked novelty, another 13 (33%) added no new clinical knowledge, and 27 (69%) were research waste. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of studies of calcium intake since 2000 (95%) and trials of vitamin D supplements since 2005 (69%) on BMD or fracture represent research waste.


Asunto(s)
Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Calcio/administración & dosificación , Suplementos Dietéticos , Residuos Sanitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Determinación de Punto Final , Fracturas Óseas/prevención & control , Humanos , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/prevención & control , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación
12.
J Healthc Qual ; 40(1): 2-8, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27427883

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aims to use lean techniques and evaluate the impact of increasing the use of premixed IV solutions and increased IV production frequency on IV waste. METHODS: Study was conducted at a tertiary hospital pharmacy department in three phases. Phase I included evaluation of IV waste when IV production occurred three times a day and eight premixed IV products were used. Phase II increased the number of premixed IV products to 16. Phase III then increased IV production to five times a day. RESULTS: During Phase I, an estimate of 2,673 IV doses were wasted monthly, accounting for 6.14% of overall IV doses. This accounted for 688 L that cost $60,135. During Phase II, the average monthly IV wastage reduced significantly to 1,069 doses (2.84%), accounting for 447 L and $34,003. During Phase III, the average monthly IV wastage was further decreased to 675 doses (1.69%), accounting for 78 L and $3,431. Hence, a potential annual saving of $449,208 could result from these changes. CONCLUSION: IV waste was reduced through the increased use of premixed solutions and increasing IV production frequency.


Asunto(s)
Administración Intravenosa/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Eficiencia Organizacional , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/prevención & control , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/organización & administración , Humanos , Ohio
14.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 159(12): 2337-2340, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29067548

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Operating rooms account for 70% of hospital waste, increasing healthcare costs and creating environmental hazards. Endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular pathologies has become prominent, and associated products highly impact the total cost of care. We investigated the costs of endovascular surgical waste at our institution. METHODS: Data from 53 consecutive endovascular procedures at the Radboud UMC Nijmegen from May to December 2016 were collected. "Unused disposable supply" was defined as one-time use items opened but not used during the procedure. Two observers cataloged the unused disposable supply for each case. The cost of each item was determined from the center supply catalog, and these costs were summed to determine the total cost of unused supply per case. RESULTS: Thirteen diagnostic cerebral digital subtraction angiographies (DSA) (24.5%) and 40 endovascular procedures (75.5%) were analyzed. Total interventional waste was 27,299.53 € (mean 515.09 € per procedure). While total costs of unused disposable supply were almost irrelevant for DSAs, they were consistent for interventional procedures (mean 676.49 € per case). Aneurysm standard coiling had the highest impact on total interventional waste (mean 1061.55 €). Disposable interventional products had a very high impact on the surgical waste costs in the series of the neurointerventional procedures (95% of total waste). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the impact of neurointerventional waste on the total care costs for cerebrovascular patients. This might reflect the tendency to anticipate needs and emergencies in neurointervention. Responsible use of disposable material can be achieved by educating operators and nurses and creating operator preference cards.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Quirófanos , Instalaciones de Eliminación de Residuos/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos
15.
Anesth Analg ; 125(4): 1289-1291, 2017 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28452819

RESUMEN

Misappropriation of noncontaminated waste into regulated medical waste (RMW) containers is a source of added expense to health care facilities. The operating room is a significant contributor to RMW waste production. This study sought to determine whether disposing of anesthesia-related waste in standard waste receptacles before patient entry into the operating room would produce a reduction in RMW. A median of 0.35 kg of waste was collected from 51 cases sampled, with a potential annual reduction of 13,800 kg of RMW to the host institution, and a cost savings of $2200.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/normas , Eliminación de Residuos Sanitarios/métodos , Eliminación de Residuos Sanitarios/normas , Residuos Sanitarios , Quirófanos/normas , Informe de Investigación , Anestesia/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Hospitales Universitarios/normas , Humanos , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Eliminación de Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Quirófanos/economía
16.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 36(2): 115-121, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27481691

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is improved by the use of labelled, ready-to-use, pre-filled syringes (PFS) when compared to conventional methods of syringe preparation (CMP) of the same product from an ampoule. However, the PFS presentation costs more than the CMP presentation. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the budget impact for French hospitals of switching from atropine in ampoules to atropine PFS for anaesthesia care. METHODS: A model was constructed to simulate the financial consequences of the use of atropine PFS in operating theatres, taking into account wastage and medication errors. The model tested different scenarios and a sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: In a reference scenario, the systematic use of atropine PFS rather than atropine CMP yielded a net one-year budget saving of €5,255,304. Medication errors outweighed other cost factors relating to the use of atropine CMP (€9,425,448). Avoidance of wastage in the case of atropine CMP (prepared and unused) was a major source of savings (€1,167,323). Significant savings were made by means of other scenarios examined. The sensitivity analysis suggests that the results obtained are robust and stable for a range of parameter estimates and assumptions. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The financial model was based on data obtained from the literature and expert opinions. CONCLUSION: The budget impact analysis shows that even though atropine PFS is more expensive than atropine CMP, its use would lead to significant cost savings. Savings would mainly be due to fewer medication errors and their associated consequences and the absence of wastage when atropine syringes are prepared in advance.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Anestésicos/economía , Anestesia , Atropina/administración & dosificación , Atropina/economía , Jeringas , Presupuestos , Ahorro de Costo , Francia , Hospitales , Humanos , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Errores de Medicación/economía , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control , Modelos Económicos
19.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) ; 44(12): 554-60, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26665242

RESUMEN

The steadily increasing demand for orthopedic surgeries and declining rates of reimbursement by Medicare and other insurance providers have led many hospitals to look for ways to control the cost of these surgeries. We reviewed administrative records for a 1-year period and recorded total number of surgical cases, number of cases in which an implant was wasted, and cost of each wasted implant. We determined cost incurred because of implant waste, percentage of cases that involved waste, percentage of total implant cost wasted, and average cost of waste per case. We then analyzed the data to determine if case volume or years in surgical practice affected amount of implant waste. Results showed implant waste represents a significant cost for orthopedic procedures within all subspecialties and is an important factor to consider when developing cost-reduction strategies.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Prótesis e Implantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/economía , Masculino , Prótesis e Implantes/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Heridas y Lesiones/economía
20.
Monash Bioeth Rev ; 33(4): 325-39, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26712610

RESUMEN

According to biomedical discourse, cord blood has been transformed from 'waste' to 'clinical gold' because of its potential for use in treatments. Private cord blood banks deploy clinical discourse to market their services to prospective parents, encouraging them to pay to bank cord blood as a form of 'biological insurance' to ensure their child's future health. Social scientists have examined new forms of (bio)value produced in biological materials emergent with contemporary biotechnologies. This paper contributes to this literature by examining the social and technical production of value in cord blood units collected for private banking. Value, in this paper is defined as a socio-cultural concept in which an object is made meaningful, or valuable, through its relations with social actors and within specific regimes of value. I draw on in-depth interviews with women who banked cord blood and key informants in private banks in Canada, to analyze how social actors produced cord blood as a valuable biological object. I show that a cord blood unit holds promissory value for women who bank and profit value for private banks and that these values are folded into each other and the biological material itself. Analyzing how specific cord blood units are made valuable provides insight into the multiple and possibly competing values of biological materials and the tensions that may arise between social actors and forms of knowledge during the valuing process.


Asunto(s)
Bancos de Muestras Biológicas/economía , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas/ética , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical/economía , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre del Cordón Umbilical/ética , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/ética , Residuos Sanitarios/economía , Residuos Sanitarios/ética , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas/organización & administración , Canadá , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/economía , Comercialización de los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Sector Privado
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...